Big business has bamboozled Ohio before, but banning data centers wrong answer

Tim RyanShawn CutterMay 13, 2026
Illustration of an integrated power, data center, and greenhouse campus in Ohio.

EA Take

Ohio can demand more than a new load on the grid. This Op-Ed makes the case for data-center development that delivers durable value to the communities that make it possible.

Read the original on The Columbus Dispatch

In this Columbus Dispatch guest column, Tim Ryan and Shawn Cutter argue that Ohio should not treat a blanket ban as its answer to data-center growth. The more important question, they contend, is what the state and its communities should require from the companies building this infrastructure.

The piece calls for a model in which development produces visible local value rather than simply adding demand. That means setting clear expectations for the public benefits that accompany a project and ensuring communities have the leverage to secure them.

For EnergiAcres, that opportunity is practical: pair reliable on-site power with data centers and productive food systems so infrastructure can support jobs, resilient local supply, and the places that host it.